Feb 18, 2013

Martin Carter

Martin Wylde Carter died at his home at midday 13 Dec 1997, at the age of 70. Carter became involved in politics in the People's Progressive Party (PPP) in the fifties. After the suspension of the Constitution and the reversion to direct British rule in 1953 he was detained by the authorities and remained in detention camp at Atkinson Field (now Timehri) for threemonths. Some of the poems he wrote there were published as Poems of Resistance in 1954 and established his Caribbean and international reputation. Cater stayed with the Jaganite faction of the PPP after the split in 1955 but later left the party.

From 1954 to 1959 he was a school-teacher. In 1959 he joined the Booker Group of Companies and remained as Bookers Chief Information Officer until In 1966 he was invited to join the talks on Guyana's Independence at Marlborough House. After Independence was achieved he was invited to join Guyana's delegation to the United Nations. In 1967 he left Bookers to join the Cabinet and held the portfolio of Minister of Information and Culture until 1970. Between 1967 and 1970 he served on Guyana's delegation annually to the U.N.

General Assembly in New York. In 1970 he resigned from the Cabinet and the Government.
In 1975 Martin Carter spent an academic year at Essex University as Poe in Residence, the longest period he was away from Guyana. In 1977 he was appointed Artist in Residence at the University of Guyana and since 198 he had been Senior Research Fellow at the University. The writing of poetry continued to preoccupy Martin Cater. In 1964, he published in the New World magazine his famous group of five poems, Jail Me Quickly. His selected poems were published in 1989 by Demerara Publishers and again in 1997 by Red Thread Press. Martin Cater was Guyana's most famous poet. He will be sorely missed by his many friends and admirers.

They say I am
They say I am a poet write for them:
Sometimes I laugh, sometimes I solemnly nod.
I do not want to look them in the eye
lest they should squeal and scamper far away.

A poet cannot write for those who ask
hardly himself even, except he lies;
Poems are written either for the dying
or the unborn, no matter what we say.

That does not mean his audience lies remote
Inside a womb or some cold bed of agony
It only means that we who want true poems
must all be born again, and die to do so.

Martin Carter

Guyana mourns the loss of its greatest poet By Andrew Richards
Prominent Guyanese have expressed a sense of loss and grief over the death of renowned Guyanese poet, Martin Carter. Carter died around midday yesterday at his home at the age of 70. Close friend and colleague, Miles Fitzpatrick, who had not yet recovered from the shock yesterday, said Guyana has lost the "jewel of its literacy heritage." He said that the country's heritage was not deep and the life of Carter was irreplaceable. "I am deeply saddened by his death," Fitzpatrick said.

Leader of the Alliance of Guyana, Dr Rupert Roopnaraine, said Guyana would be a lesser place without Carter. Hedescribed the poet as a true witness of the country's experiences over the years. "He treated us with insights into matters that affected our society," Dr Roopnaraine said. "He opened our eyes to the need for social justice and dignity. He had a passion for the truth and pursued it in what he wrote and though. He was a wonderful companion to his colleagues. We will miss his guidance."

Prime Minister, Janet Jagan, said of Carter, "I have known him for a very, very long time, since he was a young man. All these years we have been close.

Minority Leader Desmond Hoyte, said Carter was a distinguished Guyanese who played an important role in the evolution of the nation in many ways. He extended his condolences to Carter's wife, Phyllis, and his family in their time of grief. "he was deeply involved in the anti-colonial struggle of the country leading up to Guyana's independence," Hoyte said. Hailing Carter as "an outstanding poet" Hoyte said he was fortunate to have had the distinction of working with him when he (Carter) was minister of information. "He was a genial person, of good character, and very affable," the PNC leader said. "He was a close personal friend. His passing will be deeply felt by all who knew him, particularly by the many that are indebted to him."

Head of the Department of English at the University of Guyana, Dr Joyce Jonas, said "Martin Carter was Guyana's finest poet, and one of the greatest in the Caribbean standing alongside [Derek] Walcott and [Edward Kamau] Braithwaite." Dr Jonas said the loss of Carter will be deeply felt by colleagues and students at the university. "Martin was a friend, a mentor, and aninspiration to many. While we mourn his passing, we are profoundly grateful--particularly we in Guyana--for his gift to us all, of his life's work," Dr Jonas said.

Another poet and close friend of Carter's, Ian McDonald, said that it was difficult to find words at this time to describe the effect of his death. Likening him to other West Indian greats including C.L.R. James and V.S. Naipaul, McDonald said, "Words could hardly measure up to describe Martin. Everyone knew that he was Guyana's greatest poet and is distinguished throughout the West Indies. I feel as time goes by he will be recognised throughout the Americas and eventually gain world stature."

Martin had a vision of decency Rory Westmaas looks back at a lifelong friendship
Martin Carter's lasting gift to the Guyanese people, according to Rory Westmaas, a long time friend of the late national poet of Guyana, is "the vision of the decency to which human beings can aspire." It was an opiniondelivered after careful thought in an invited comment to the Stabroek News. Carter, who died on Saturday, and Westmaas were friends from their days at Queen's College. Westmaas said too that Carter would have made an excellent president as people would have respected his intellectuality, his superior imagination, and there would have been no back-biting.

As a person, Westmaas described Carter as "generous to more than a fault," recalling an incident when both of them were unemployed but smoked a lot, taking two cigarettes from him, one of which he gave away. And, according to Westmaas, Carter accepted people as they were, though he might have been said if they failed in the decency test, as he never set standards for his friends. However, he did set high ones for himself.

A decent person "He was a decent, exciting, stimulating, compassionate individual. There was nothing crude or objectionable about him in his dealings with anyone. He was a great person," Westmaas observed. In their long association, Westmaas said that there were a number of incidents, which demonstrated the person that Carter was but that he had difficulty recalling them off the bat just like that.

One of them, he recalled was one in which Carter, himself and some friends arrived at Carter's home just as an earth tremor occurred. Caught by surprise, they stood watching the shadows of the trees and overhead power lines dancing on the walls of Carter's home. Westmaas recalled that Martin was the first to snap out of the astonishment, quipping "Come on man, are you going to let an earthquake stop us from having a drink?"

Another incident indicative of the spontaneity of support readily given, Westmaas recalled, was Carter's reaction to Peter Fry's resignation from the Community Party of Great Britain following the Soviet invasion of Hungary. On hearing the news, Westmaas said that Carter wrote to Fry telling him that he would have done the same thing if he were in his place. He recalled too Martin refusing to attend a reception to which he had invited Westmaas to go with him during the World Festival of Youth in Bucharest where they would have meet a number of the leading writers of the day.Westmaas said that by Martin's refusal to attend the reception after he (Westmaas) was barred from entering, the door-man was forced to let them both in.
Such acts of solidarity were not uncharacteristic of him, Westmaas said, adding that it was a demonstration of such solidarity that led him to resign from the Civil Service.

The 1953 days Pressed to recall incidents during 1953 when he, Martin and Sidney King (now Eusi Kwayana), were the leading radicals of the day, Westmaas said that he found it strange that people though it extraordinary when they were only doing what people elsewhere had done before. He observed that when the 1953 Commission was suspended and the movement of the leaders of the PPP were restricted including Martin, Sidney and Rory it was an imposition they could not accept. As a result, it led to their being arrested and held in detention at the then Atkinson Field. Of the experience, Westmaas said that they kept each other's company, with Martin keeping their spirits high since he was not a man to groan about anything.

On the left of their time in the PPP, Westmaas said that they were in the Communist oriented section of the party, with the late Cheddi Jagan in the left wing social democratic section and Forbes Burnham in the right wing social democratic section. As a result, he said that the PPP leadership of the day was not prepared to give them too much prominence. For instance, he said that at the 1953 elections, he was nominated to fight the elections for a constituency in the North West and Carter to fight the seat in New Amsterdam against W. O. R. Kendall, contests which they were not expected to win.

Westmaas said that he was subsequently withdrawn from the North West contest and he went to campaign with Carter in New Amsterdam where they had a marvellous time. Of the results at the 1953 elections, Westmaas said that when he returned from England in 1953, he immediately went around to Carter's home and they discussed what would have been the likely outcome of the elections as a result of their assessment of the PPP hierarchy. They then arrived at the conclusion that the PPP would win between 17-19 seats as against Jagan who was predicting they would have only won 12 of the 24 seats of the House of Assembly. Westmaas said that Carter had a good assessment of the men in the party and could have read them like a book.

Not on Jagan's list of their break from the PPP with which he and Martin had stayed after Burnham left the party, Westmaas said that it occurred as a result of the manipulation of the electoral process by Jagan. He said that they obtained a list, which was being circulated by Jagan ofpersons he would like elected to the general council and executive party. Of course himself and Martin were not on the list, since Westmaas said that with Burnham gone there was no buffer between Jagan and their communist-oriented group.

Westmaas said that they called a meeting to which Jagan was invited and at which he refused to withdraw the list, though they argued that he (Jagan) should not indulge in such a practice. He and Carter resigned at anappropriate time. He said too that on the question of the federation, Westmaas said that he and Carter voted with Burnham on the issue. He explained that the committee which dealt with the matter considered of Ashton Chase, Forbes Burnham, Carter and himself, adding that Martin felt that federation was the way to go.

Jagan, he said, would have nothing to do with the federation because of the lack of Indian support for the idea. Westmaas said that he found this out as a result of a recent statement by Eusi Kwayana, adding that he now had to re-read the West on Trial by Jagan with a more critical eye.

Burnham Of Burnham, Westmaas said that he could not recollect Carter speaking harshly of him, though he might have criticised him about some policy or other, but such criticism was always made in Burnham's presence. About Carter's reaction to the achievement of independence, Westmaas said that it was an exhilarating time for him, and that his poetry caught the mood of the people, but he (Carter) was conscious too of the fact that it would take a long time to bring about a change in the thinking of the people who had been acculturated to the culture of another country. Of Carter's relations with children, Westmaas said that generous man though Carter was, his generosity never over- whelmed his children. But Westmaas said that no description of Carter would be complete without mention of his wife Phyllis who was always there to support him and was always there for Martin's friends.
Steeped in European culture but with deep seated radical impulses

By David de Caires
I met Martin Carter in the early sixties. No longer the young revolutionary dreaming to change the world Martin was bitterly cynical. We used to meet quite frequently on Sundays at his mother's house in Anira Street, Queenstown, where his elder brother Keith also lived. Keith had, like Martin, been a member of the People's Progressive Party in the fifties. On those Sundays large quantities of rum were consumed. Yeats was Martin's favourite poet and he would frequently recite passages from his work, in particular from Easter 1916, the part near the end that begins "And what if excess of love bewildered them till they died" as well as excerpts from the Second Coming. Keith's favourite party piece as the day progressed and the alcoholic content increased was Pericles funeral oration. Rory Westmaas, another mate from the fifties, would sometimes be there. Rory delighted in singing a song from the Spanish Civil War.

Through the day there would be loud declamations against a variety of institutions and people.
At first I was quite concerned about how the neighbours would take all ofthis. I later recognised that they had become quite used to it and had either written Keith and Martin off as incurably eccentric or were too overawed to do anything. I understood that what was going on was essentially a cri de coeur against the colonial condition, accentuated I believe, by their own internal contradictions. Keith and Martin were both exceptionally intelligent men, steeped in European culture but with deep-seated radical impulses. Typical of the mixed middle class in some ways, but not in others, they exemplified some of the contradictions in the West Indian intelligentsia.

They were both lapsed communists and indeed one of the first questions they would ask a new acquaintance with left wing credentials, real or imagined, was "have you thawed out yet?" Keith was the more radical, Martin the poet and thinker.

When the New World fortnightly magazine was started in October, 1964 Martin wrote us a letter of welcome, which was published in our first issue. In it, among other things, he said: "life in a country as materialistic and philistine as B.G. soon blunts the edge of the mind. The almost fanatical preoccupation with hollow issues, the gossip-mongering which passes for conversation, and the inevitable political hysteria, leave little time for the serious examination of ideas. I know that the psychological squalor of everyday life is exhausting. I know that the urgent practical problem of making a living comes first. What I do not know is why only so few revolt, either by word or by deed against such acute spiritual discomfort."

At the end of 1964 Martin gave us for publications five poems under the title "Jail me quickly". They were published in our second, third and fourth issues and created a considerable impression. They were republished in issue No. 34 on 18th February, 1966. The poem were Black Friday 1962, After one year. What can a man do more, Where are free men and Childhood of a voice. They have always been among my favourites. New World Fortnightly was published on a shoestring budget and I regret to say no fee was paid. We were deeply touched by Martin's generosity and support in allowing us first publication.

In 1966 we invited Martin Carter and George Lamming to be the joint editors of the Guyana Independence Issue of New World. In addition to his work as editor Martin contributed 'A question of self-contempt' with its wonderful vignettes on Mr Bovell and Mr Singh. I believe this should be a part of any anthology of Martin's work. It contains the following passage: "And I look at Bovell's skull and saw a bump. I wondered whether an owner had turned
homuncule and taken up residence. My own head I rubbed. He was wondering why. Incapable of explanation, I remained silent."

George and Martin did an excellent job, but unfortunately we ended up heavily in debt. We printed too many copies, largely due to George's enthusiasm on the possibility of overseas sales. Regrettably we were never paid by our distributors in London, New York and elsewhere and New World Fortnightly ceased publication shortly thereafter. Martin has been a director of Guyana Publications Limited, the company that publishes the newspaper Stabroek News of which I am chairman, since its inception in 1986 the year after President Forbes Burnham died. For the past ten years Martin, Lloyd Searwar, Miles Fitzpatrick, Ian McDonald and myself have had dinner once a month at each other's homes to share our news.


Martin Carter is a large man in every sense of that word. With his strong, brooding presence and his eternal, bitter hope he has always represented for many of us a challenge to keep going and to do what we can and a proof of the enormous potential and possibilities in our Caribbean region. His bitterness and despair have been a measure of his hope. In his various undertakings, his trials and tribulations, his long depression he has retained a quality of spiritual integrity without which we would all have been much poorer.

No comments: